![]() ![]() “I believe that the story exists,” Herstein said. He waved away a Washington Post story held up on a reporter’s phone. Still, Herstein said he doesn’t believe it’s the case that Trump is on pace to spend more on vacation and travel. Similarly, Arthur Herstein, 74, a writer from Bowie, Maryland, said he was frustrated by Obama’s “over-the-top” vacation and travel expenses. “But the way people make up the stories about the Trumps, I don’t know if I believe it. “I resented Obama going to all these places overseas, particularly because his agenda was anti-American,” Ely said. Overwhelmingly, the most common reason they cited was that they didn’t trust the underlying story - because they didn’t trust the press to tell the truth.ĭonald Ely, 83, a Pennsylvania Republican Party official, had heard the stories of Trump’s travel expenses. On Wednesday, more than a dozen CPAC attendees greeted those reports with skepticism, hostility, and, in few occasions, mild concern. CPAC attendees: We don’t believe Trump’s trips are costing more than Obama’s Grace Germany, a Trump voter unconcerned by his travel budget. We use our smarts to protect the our political groups, and not to grapple with uncomfortable truths. And, frustratingly, research finds the more knowledgeable we are about politics, the more stubborn we get on politically charged topics. ![]() And simply stating factual information that contradicts those deeply held beliefs is often not enough to combat the spread of misinformation. Humans are also very adept at ignoring facts so that we can continue to see the world in a way that conforms to our preconceived notions. ![]() We are often guided by our emotions and deeply held biases. It's nothing new, or particular to conservatives, for partisans to fit inconvenient facts into their preexisting narratives.Īs Vox's Brian Resnick and Julia Belluz have written, research has found that people are remarkably adept at fitting new information to existing frameworks or beliefs: Of course, the accusation of politically motivated reasoning - of dismissing conclusions that hurt your preferred party, candidate, or ideology - isn't limited to any part of the American political spectrum. The Post reported that the first family’s “unusually elaborate lifestyle” poses massive new logistical hurdles, creating new strains on the Secret Service that could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. According to the Washington Post, Trump’s three trips to Mar-a-Lago have already cost a combined $10 million - compared with Obama’s average annual travel budget of $12 million. Since taking office, Trump appears to have opened himself up to similar attacks. Another faulted Michelle Obama for her allegedly lavish Spanish getaway - though the Obamas personally paid for the bulk of its expenses. ![]() Though debunked by fact-checkers, one rumor claimed that first pup Bo Obama got his own personal flight to join the family in Hawaii. Over the course of the Obama administration, outrage over the president’s travel expenses became a major talking point in right-wing circles. But if they will look at this honestly - and I’m all for the truth - they’ll see Trump is just using his own resources and money to take care of things,” Chaulk said. The news media can say, ‘Trump went to Mar-a-Lago,’ and their hair catches on fire. Obama went on so many vacations and played golf every week. Their sentiments were widely shared here at CPAC, where attendees gave a wide array of explanations for why they were outraged by Obama’s travel spending but not Trump’s. They are less concerned - which is to say, not concerned at all - with recent reports that suggest President Trump cost taxpayers nearly as much in his first month in office as Obama did in a year. Her friend Elaine Kent, 58, chimed in: “And when Michelle Obama and her friends went to Spain and spent millions of dollars on a vacation? They did so much nickel-and-diming of taxpayers." “When Obama put his dog on Air Force One and then told us to give more to help poor people, it was a slap in the face to the entire country,” Chaulk, 60, a graphic designer from Columbus, Ohio, said on Wednesday at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), the marquee annual gathering for conservative activists. NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland - Sarah Chaulk says she remains “extremely bitter” about how much taxpayer money was spent on President Barack Obama’s travel and family vacations during his time in office. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |